Masjid Al-Aqsa: The correct Responce

[showkot]

In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. I witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His messenger.

Oh Muslims,

The event of the hour is the visit of Sharon (The jewish minsiter and the butcher of Muslims in Sabra and Shateila Camps) along with a few Jewish leaders to al-Aqsa Mosque. Hundreds if not thousands of policemen guarded them.

Sharon is challenging more than one billion Muslim all over the world.

What should be the response to Sharon’s visit of Islam’s holy place?

Should we respond only by throwing stones, or by condemnation?

Sharon or Barak would not dare to challenge Muslims if there was a leader for the Muslims (i.e. a Khalifah) who would declare Jihad against them to remove their state completely.

The visit of this Jewish butcher of Muslims has come at a time when the case of Palestine has been distorted

from being a war between Muslims and disbelievers ;

to a war between Arabs and Jews ;

to a call to apply UN resolutions ;

to a conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians ;

to a conflict about the refugees ;

then a conflict around the status of Jerusalem ;

and then finally to conflict over the status of al-Aqsa Mosque.



Who will forbid the Jews from committing massacres today in al-Aqsa Mosque? This may well become a new excuse (for them) to continue the so-called peace process or in another words, to surrender Palestine to the Jews completely!

For more than 50 years the imperialist disbelievers have planned our opposition to the Jews to stay confined to just demonstrations, throwing stones and conspiracies.

We have not heard one ruler from the Muslim lands declaring that he wants to eradicate the Jews from Palestine. Instead they declare that Sharon’s visit is the cause of the problems because choose to defend Barak and the Labor party.

Al-Aqsa Mosque was under occupation by the Crusaders for more than 90 years. It used to be a stable for their horses. But only when the Muslim Ummah declared Jihad was al-Aqsa Mosque liberated.

The same thing applies today, this Mosque will not be liberated until Jihad is declared by a trusted authority. Who else would that be except the coming Khalifah Insha’Allah.

I call all the Muslims to work for this purpose:

“They see the (Day) indeed as a far-off (event): But We see it (quite) near.”

Ameen.

[mahdi]

bismil rabil noor,
assalamu alaikum,
you might have heard that shaikh hassan nasrollah, the leader of hizbullah in south lebanon called on the palestinians to implement hizbullah's method(jihad) in freeing palestine.
there are many members of hizbullah right now fighing in the street battles that were sparked off with sharon's visit.
but when we keep saying if there was a khalif this and that would happen we should instead encourage muslims to give bay'a to such existing leaders. a khlif without an umma that wold follow his command would not be of any use.
therefore, please, now that this pious man who started his own jihad many years ago under the command of imam khomeini(a true khalif that umma did not give bay'a to) and now has successfully with a small army kicked israel out, let us gather around him.
the right step to getting an islamic state is to support a good leader and build his followig until he has sufficient power to declare jihad.
this is reality, there is not going to be , over night, a man that declares himslef as khalif and the whole ummah will say let us go and do jihad.
as for the correct response to the incident,
i think the palestinians have for he first time given the correct response, which is to give their lives for islam.
i only pray that this continues as israelis are cowards and would not be able to sustain any resistance.
let us all pray for them. may allah give them help and may one day we too have the honour to die or islam.
wasalam,
mahdi

[Abdur_Rahman]

Salm to all and may the Protection of Allah be upon the opressed masses.

Brother mahdi what you have said makes every sense. To look for the solution of Palestine all we need to do is look at what Hezbullah has done. Hezbollah a small group with little materials but total faith in the Supreme Being has managed to do what all the Arabs countries combined together could not doin the last 50+ years, namely they have Physically and militaily KICKED out the regional 'super power' the Zionits.
I agree that the Muslims of Palestine and other areas should follow the example of the Hezbollah and seek their assistance and with he Help of the Almighty there shall be no Army of Occupation bread on innocent blood.

The following was taken form the Independent some one posted to me:

By Robert Fisk

2 October 2000

When I read the word "crossfire", I reach for my pen. In the Middle East,
it almost always means that the Israelis have killed an innocent person.
When the Israelis fired shells into the United Nations compound at Qana in
southern Lebanon in 1996, Time magazine printed a photograph of a dead
baby with a caption saying it had been killed in "crossfire". This was
untrue. The baby had been killed in the Israeli bombardment along with 105
other civilians which started after Hizbollah guerrillas opened fire on
an Israeli army unit that was laying booby-trap mines inside the UN zone.

So when 12-year-old Mohammed al-Durah was killed in Gaza on Saturday and I
read on the Associated Press wire that the child was "caught in the
crossfire", I knew at once who had killed him. Sure enough, reporters
investigating the killing said the boy was shot by Israeli troops. So was
his father who survived and so was the ambulance driver who was killed
trying to rescue the boy. Yet BBC World Service Television was still
saying yesterday morning that Mohammed al-Durah was "caught in the
crossfire of a battle that has left hundreds wounded and killed many
others". I knew what this meant.

True, the Israeli soldiers who killed the boy may not have known whom they
hit. They were apparently firing through a wall. But why the reluctance on
the part of journalists to tell the truth? Why was it that in its report
from Jerusalem on Saturday, the AP only mentioned in paragraph 17, for
heaven's sake that Israeli troops, on the word of their own officer,
fired anti-tank missiles during the confrontation? What was the Israeli
army doing using missiles against rioters?

By yesterday afternoon, the story had been transformed into a "blame"
conflict. The Israelis blamed the Palestinian authority for organising
riots. BBC World Service radio ran a tape of an Israeli official stating
that rioters were "shooting [sic] Molotov cocktails and stones" which
"kill people". A listener might have been forgiven for thinking that 22
Israelis had been killed rather than 22 Palestinians in the previous 72
hours. The BBC then ran a tape of Nabil Shaath, the Palestinian spokesman,
saying that the Israelis, not the Palestinians, had been shooting.

Truth is a hard bullet to bite. Palestinian policemen had also opened fire
on the Israelis. Ironically, the Arab press in Beirut had no hesitation in
saying this. The press in Lebanon showed photographs of Palestinian
policemen firing Kalashnikov rifles at Israeli troops. But, given the fact
that they did not kill Israelis one of them was hit while firing was it
not worth mentioning that the Palestinians were the victims, not the
Israelis?

When BBC Television got round to mentioning Ariel Sharon's flagrantly
provocative visit to the Haram as-Sharif/ Temple Mount on Thursday, they
yesterday called him an "Israeli leader" when for Palestinians he was
the man who bore indirect responsibility (according to Israel's own
inquiry) for the massacre of up to 2,000 Palestinian civilians in the
Sabra and Chatila refugee camps in Beirut 18 years ago. The BBC
correspondent, Paul Adams, was one of the very few who bravely drew
attention to Sharon's appalling record, pointing out Sharon had "an
extraordinary capacity to leave... destruction in his wake."

And so, by last night, the story had changed. No longer did Israeli
soldiers and policemen kill at least 22 Palestinians in three days; now
the question was whether the Palestinian Authority organised the riots
that "led" [sic] to their deaths. The Israeli soldiers, who disobeyed
every human rights commitment by firing on rioters with live rounds, were
respectfully called the "Israeli security forces", disregarding the fact
that "security" was the one thing Israeli soldiers were clearly unable to
provide.

On CNN and the BBC and other satellite chains, reporters were asked if the
killings would upset the "peace process", with no willingness to explain
that it was the collapse of the peace process which lay at the heart of
the riots. The Muslim holy areas of Jerusalem were "disputed" although UN
Security Council resolution 242, upon which the "peace process" is
supposedly based, demands the withdrawal of Israeli forces from
territories captured during the 1967 war, including east Jerusalem.

What lies behind this apart from the sheep-like inability of many
journalists to call a spade a spade was the continuing belief that
Palestinians are, by nature, violent and riotous.

The United States called for an end to the "violence" this courtesy of
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright without making any reference to
Sharon's grotesque visit to the mosque grounds of east Jerusalem. By
yesterday afternoon, the BBC were at it again, reporting that "Israeli
authorities were bracing themselves for what may lie ahead". Weren't the
Palestinians also doing that?

[Nur]

Originally posted by showkot:
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful. I witness that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His messenger.

Sharon or Barak would not dare to challenge Muslims if there was a leader for the Muslims (i.e. a Khalifah) who would declare Jihad against them to remove their state completely.

Who will forbid the Jews from committing massacres today in al-Aqsa Mosque?

We have not heard one ruler from the Muslim lands declaring that he wants to eradicate the Jews from Palestine.

The same thing applies today, this Mosque will not be liberated until Jihad is declared by a trusted authority. Who else would that be except the coming Khalifah Insha’Allah.

I call all the Muslims to work for this purpose:

Salaam,
Are you referring to the awaited Mahdi when you mention Khalifah? He is the Imam or Leader that all muslims have been waiting for. However, he will not appear unless the muslims change themselves and follow the Quran and the ways of the Prophet (PBUH) and other pious beleivers. Muslims cannot expect the Mahdi to come and then start doing something - they have to start behaving like believers first and strive to create an Islamic atmosphere and pave the ways for the Imam then insh'Allah the Mahdi will appear.

If by Khalifa you refer to any pious muslim leader then there are examples in recent history of muslims leaders who have always spoken out against Israel and who have never accepted the state of Israel, unlike the arab leaders.

In particular I refer to Imam Khomeini, who by his speeches and action was against the state of Israel before and after the Islamic Revolution in Iran. While arab leaders have openly welcomed the illegal state of israel and have established diplomatic relations with them including having israeli embassies in their countries, Iran under the guidance of Imam Khomeini and under the guidance of the current Spiritual Leader of Iran has never and insh'Allah will never accept the criminal state of israel.

Inspired by Imam Khomeini's speeches against the crimimal state of israel and his advise on how how to deal with them, the Hizbollah formed and have succeeded in driving out the israeli forces within 2 decades, something all the arab governments put together with their armies failed to do. No doubt some of the palestinians feel inspired by the success of the islamic methods used by Hizbollah in freeing their land and will try to do the same.

Moreover the method used by Hizbollah is an islamic one and one used by Imam Hussain himeslf. Imam Hussain had no powerful army but a handful of companions against an army of 30,000. But that did not stop him from fighting the enemies of Islam. The way for palestinians is not to wait for a khilafa but to follow the Quran, the Prophet (PBUH) and other pious believers including Imam Hussain, one of the leaders of te Youths of Paradise.

[mahdi]

bismil rabil noor,
assalmu alaikum,
excellent comments by br Abdur Rahman and Nur.
The fault lies first with the palestinians and then with the rest of the umma.
they followed secualrism and arafaat for many years. they followed arab nationalism for many years.
lebanese succeeded because being arabs they left nationalism and followed imam khomeini and after his demise imam khamenei the present leader of the muslim umma.
if ayat khamenei today declares war on the lebanese governmet , which is secular, hizbullah will not hesitate. their allegiance is with the leader, khalif, whatever you call him, the one we should all give bai'a to.
i truley beleive that if and only if, muslim openly march in the streets of their countries and give him allegiance, israel will leave without a fight.
he is a true student of imam khomeini,a mujtahid of sound knowledge. very few people in the whole word are alive who can match his knowledge, extremely pious. he has slept many nights during his youth on the battlefield in struggle with kuffar. he spent many years under torture and in prison and then exile because of his allegiance, bay'a to his leader imam khomeini.
he was target of many american attempts on his life and finally on one occassion while he was giving a khotba in a mosque, a bomb exploded under the platform and since then he has lost the use of his right hand. but he has always been defiant.
in one of his books on quran, inthe introduction he wrote. the attempt on my life has increased my drive to serve allah s.w.t.(because he saw the attack onhim as a mercy and that he was chosen by Him).
while we are shouting for a khalif let us start encouraging our umma to give bay'a to the one who is being ignored because the so called mini leaders that we have rather than pointing us to the correct direction lead us astray and into darkness, because after all all such people are agents or mouth fed by america, directly or indirectly.
ayat khamenei just in the last year has given at least ten speeches inwhich he has condemend camp david and told the palestinians that the solution is jehad. now they are listening! the recent uprising is assited by hizbullah and this time israel is in trouble.
imam khomeini used to say 'israel must be distroyed and anyone negotiating is a rator to the umma' but where were we to hear it?
the likes of hizbur tahrir just gave slogans and asked the umma to sit and wait for the would be khalif to come from the sky and issue jihad, as if the world was to stop and suddenly restart with the khalif in position.
they betrayed the umma by doing do, instead they should have called for bay'a to imam khomeini, the iraninan did and won, the lebanese did and won the palestianian if they do they will win and the rest of umma did not and they are humiliated by secular leaders(dictator) who are agents.
apologies for the lengthy reply
wasalam
mahdi

[islamicboy]

salaam brother


why is iran part of the united nations??? and why is part of the iranian constitution based on the french constitution???

jazak allah

[Abdur_Rahman]

Originally posted by islamicboy:
salaam brother


why is iran part of the united nations??? and why is part of the iranian constitution based on the french constitution???

jazak allah

I am sure brother Mahdi wil answer your questions.

I did not know that part of the Iranian Constitution is 'based on the French constitution'!!

Out of interest brother can you tell us exactly which part it is that is based on the French constitution?

Salam and take care