War is looming in South Asia.

[Sree]

Dear Sree, I am not agree that the absence or presence of riot is not an example of peace and disturbance or respect for the human values.

Dear Khalid, my point is that when the minority population in a country is less than 5 % of the populationof the country, you might not see communal riots in the country. And yet, that need not mean minorities are allowed basic human rights. There should be other parameters apart from presence/absence of communal riots, for our consideration.

Frooq Abdul is a puppet, he enjoys no influence own his subject, he is imposed by the Dehli government and thus facing condemnations and cursed by his own fellow kashmiris.

You are entitled to your opinion on this. As much as I have an opinion that the government in Pakistan occupied Kashmir is a puppet controlled by Pakistan. Which is why Pakistani troops were allowed to pass through and even cross the line of control in Kargil, to indian territory.

Tell me if the insurgency in the kashmir valley is not of indiginence charactor,then why india find it appropriate to keep more than half million military presence there?

You have answered your own question. Because the insurgency has foreign origins, specifically from Pakistan. Indian government thinks it necessary to keep such military contingent there, to prevent intrusions like the one seen in Kargil.

You can't rebut that kashmir is disputed territory and is on united nations charter that command india to hold plebiscite in kashmir to know their will.

Yes, and when they say Kashmir, they mean the Kashmir on both sides of the line of control. The first condition in the UN resolutions is that Pakistan should withdraw her troops from POK, and allow the conduct of free and fair elections. Foreign militants should not be allowed to terrorise the local population and jeopardize the election process.

It is true that iran and iraq had fought a very lengthy war in recent history, but was instigated by the united states of america and west to block islamic revolution in iran and to control the oil that is as importent for industrialized west as blood for human body.

The invasion of kuwait is also conspired by the then usa ambassador to Baghdad, who refreshed and supported the iraqi claim on kuwait. The strategy was to maintain american presence in the region and destroy iraqi capability to threaten israel.

Great to read this from a Pakistani (my apologies, if you aren't one). Yes, it is true that America plays all kinds of dirty political games. All along the cold war, India as founder of the NAM, kept a distance from both super powers. While Pakistan was cosying up to the US doing them all kinds of favours, apparently for help in its hatred towards India. And now that the cold war is over, America thought it best to dump Pakistan and look for new allies outside. While america was playing all kinds of games in the middle east, what was Pakistan doing. This is how global politics work, my friend. I only HOPE that the Indian government doesn't fall for the new found cameraderie with the US.

Tell me, why Maha Bharata had been fought, while the both foes were hindu.

Yes, my friend. Hindus do fight with each other. But then in Hinduism there's no concept of fighting against non-Hindus. Nor will you find any hindu fighting for the sake of religion.(unlike the misguided terrorists who seem to think that by blowing up the Indian Parliament they are doing Islam a great favour). Because at least conceptually, Hinduism says people in the whole world are one. It says 'lokah samastha sukhino bhavanthu' - ie let people in the whole world be happy and peaceful.

Why there are so much insurgencies in the india entity, for instance in Tripura, Naga Land, Assam,Punjab, Kashmir and Tamal Nadu etc?

My dear Sree, the people of all these states of indian uninion has and had felt themselves safe then there would have been no uprising there.

The only 'insurgency' is in the North East. In the Kargil war with Pakistan, the whole of India was together, contributing men and money for the cause. States that you mention, like Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Assam etc were in the forefront in doing so, as statistics say.

As for the insurgency in the North east, that was manipulated by the ISI. India was late in waking up to the reality of foreign motivated insurgency.

[KhalidMBhattiHelsingor]

India a member of NAM yet the staunch supportor of former soviet Russia and importor of russian arms.

Pakistan has never denied to hold plebscite in Azad Kashmir.
If the case is so then let start negotiation on the issue involving third party. You know it is not that eassy because of indian fear that kashmiris might join pakistan.