dhumketu

[666]

hey people, this is our new online web community
http://www.dhumketu.us cehck it out

[christy]

[quote]Originally posted by 666

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As a true follower of the Bible Let me show you what 666 is in the Bible.

Revelation 13:18 Wisdom is needed to understand this. Let the one who has understanding solve the **number of the beast,** for it is the number of a man.* His number is 666. (Note: The Beast is the Ant-Christ). By taking 666 you have shown yourself to be against Jesus Christ or Isa Son of Mariam.

[666]

[quote]Originally posted by christy

Originally posted by 666

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As a true follower of the Bible Let me show you what 666 is in the Bible.

Revelation 13:18 Wisdom is needed to understand this. Let the one who has understanding solve the **number of the beast,** for it is the number of a man.* His number is 666. (Note: The Beast is the Ant-Christ). By taking 666 you have shown yourself to be against Jesus Christ or Isa Son of Mariam.

yeah...u dont need to teach me the bible. ive read it. and for UR info. im not a follower of the bible. and the thing u have posted is from the new testamont, try reading the old one...

[christy]

[b][quote]Originally posted by 666

yeah...u dont need to teach me the bible. ive read it. and for UR info. im not a follower of the bible. and the thing u have posted is from the new testamont, try reading the old one...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First of all , what reason do you have that I should not read the New Testament (NT)?

What makes you think that he NT is inferior to the OT?

FYI the OT is he foundation for the NT. The Bible is like a well-built building. It has two major parts. The foundation which is laid first, and then the main structure that is built upon it.

Almighty God made the foundation very strong, solid and firm so that the main structure--the New Testament--could stand any kind of bad "weather" including "earthquakes" like "higher criticism".

The Bible has been attacked for the past 3500 years from the time prophet Moses wrote the Torah, the first 5 books. But it has withstood every kind of "foul weather" inluding visious attacks by some so-called christians theologians of "higher criticism."

-------------------------------

Higher criticism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

"Higher criticism originally referred to the work of a group of German Biblical scholars centered in Tübingen, including Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768–1834), David Friedrich Strauss (1808–1874), and Ludwig Feuerbach (1804–1872), who began in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries to analyze the historical records of the Middle East from Christian and Old Testament times, in search of independent confirmation of events related in the Bible. They are the intellectual descendants of John Locke, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Gotthold Lessing, Gottlieb Fichte, Georg Hegel, and the French rationalists.

These ideas were taken to England by Samuel Taylor Coleridge and, in particular, by George Eliot's translations of Strauss's Life of Jesus (1846) and Feuerbach's Essence of Christianity (1854). La Vie de Jésus (1863), by a Frenchman, Ernest Renan (1823–1892), continued the same tradition. But three years earlier before the appearance of La Vie de Jésus, liberal Anglican theologians had begun the process of incorporating this historical criticism into Christian doctrine in Essays and Reviews (1860). In Catholicism, L'Evangile et l'Eglise (1902), by Alfred Loisy, against the Essence of Christianity of Adolf von Harnack and less inspired than Renan, gave birth to the modernist crisis (1902–1961). Some scholars, such as Rudolf Bultmann, have used higher criticism of the Bible to demythologize it. This endeavour is seen as heretical by Orthodox Jews and many traditional Christians. Those scholars, as well as religiously liberal Christians and Jews, typically respond by pointing out that belief in God has nothing to do with belief in whether a certain text, such as the Bible, has more than one author. Furthermore, they point out that it is circular reasoning to use claims within the Bible to "prove" the authenticity of the Bible."