|
|||||||
WHO BETTER SHAH RUKH OR HRITHIK??
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hellooo...
Im new here, this is my first post! I fink Shah rukh is better than hritik. He's a good actor and realistically good looking. He doesn't show off his muscles or weird dance moves like Hritik does. A lot of Indian actors don't look Indian! They try to adopt characteristics of white people that often dont suit them. Shah rukh looks asian and doesn't try to be something he's not. He's done challenging roles in bazigaar, darr and anjaam and they were his early films! Whereas hritik, salman and amir khan had straightforward romeo sort characters. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yeh, I agree with you, Sharukh is much better than Salman and hritik. Salman is too coky and often shows his body. But I find Aamir has the edge over Sharukh. ------------------------------------------------------------ “Destroy whatever you like but don’t break anyone’s heart For God dwells therein” |
|
|||
|
well.....
i would say shah rukn is better coz in the kabie khusie kabie ghum he jus look out of the world!! in that song suraj huwa madham!!he looked sooo nice!!!!!!!!! hrithik got the nicest eyes!!!and smile!!!!but still shah rukh is better!!!!
__________________
\\\\::: NO ONE MESSES AROUND WIV SYLHETI GIRLS ::\\\\
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:28.






Linear Mode

Algeria
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Scotland
South Africa
Ukraine
Virtual Countries