What a justified move by United nation to exempt USA of it contribution to the UNO?

[KhalidMBhattiHelsingor]

United nation's move to exempt half of United states of america dues,will bring great burdden on the poor third world's and rich arab
countries to pay off for this thug,aggresive,unjustifiabl,extortor, and exploiter of the world and united nation.

I think the timing about the finance reforms discussion was very shroudly and conspirately sat by the USA's mafia in this organization.
The UNO's members countries staffer at the head quarter were in hurry to go back to their countries on Cristma and Eid-u-fitr's holidays.
It is therefore they weren't prepare for long debates that could have prolonged the session of united nation.
This reduction of American dues will automatically force UNO to increase it's contribution fee for the member nations.

And frist time in history of united nation an individual person are being allowed to pay some USA's dues. The person is CNN's founder
Ted Turner he has promised to allocate $34 million for this purpose. This move hints that rule can be change, when it matters United
States of America.

United nation is a parasite, the third world nation, particularly muslim must abandone it, when UNO is working on the American and
Eurpea agenda to promulgate and propogate their religion and cultur.

[yasmin]

OK I think that we can take from your views that you have a very dim view of the west. However, I must take issue with regards to the fundiing thing. The US and UK pay vast amounts of money to fund the UN. In fact the UK and US alone pay more money than any of the other nations put together. It makes perfect sense to me that the US would want to reduce their own financial burdens.

The UK taxpayers puts in 100's of millions of pound into an EU which we are not part of. We pay a hugely disproportionate amount of money to these organisations for no gain. It is up to the 3rd world countries to structure themselves better and look in how they can utilise funds for the future.

I am growing sick and tired of hearing the same old excuse that the US is evil blah... blah.... blah...

OF COURSE THEY'RE EVIL. SO WHY ARE YOU TURNING TO THE DEVIL FOR MORE MONEY.

[KhalidMBhattiHelsingor]

Originally posted by yasmin
OK I think that we can take from your views that you have a very dim view of the west. However, I must take issue with regards to the fundiing thing. The US and UK pay vast amounts of money to fund the UN. In fact the UK and US alone pay more money than any of the other nations put together. It makes perfect sense to me that the US would want to reduce their own financial burdens.

The UK taxpayers puts in 100's of millions of pound into an EU which we are not part of. We pay a hugely disproportionate amount of money to these organisations for no gain. It is up to the 3rd world countries to structure themselves better and look in how they can utilise funds for the future.

I am growing sick and tired of hearing the same old excuse that the US is evil blah... blah.... blah...

OF COURSE THEY'RE EVIL. SO WHY ARE YOU TURNING TO THE DEVIL FOR MORE MONEY.

But it is the USA and the great britain that controls the united nation and its secutrity council, where they kill the democracy by their veto. When united nation is their show, why then we are being forced to pay to strenthen their hands. There is no third world countries representation in the united nation all high ranked job held by the whites or in some cases by Japanese.United nation is an alter where human rights are slaughtered.

[yasmin]

But Kofi Annan is black. The last time I looked.

[KhalidMBhattiHelsingor]

Originally posted by yasmin
But Kofi Annan is black. The last time I looked.

Do you think I am talking about white or black supermacy. I am asking about the justification and retionality of the exemption.